Understand any court case in seconds.

Ask Lexi: AI-powered legal intelligence platform for federal court records research.

1B+ Documents
One-Click Research
Every Federal District Court

How It Works

Any federal case, any question - Just ask Lexi.

1

Search a Case

Search by case name, docket number, or party names. Access 1B+ federal court records across all 50 states.

2

Ask Lexi Questions

Ask simple, everyday questions. "What's this case about?" "Who won?" "When's the trial?"

3

Get Instant Answers

Instant AI summaries with direct links to the documents.

Try Our Interactive Demos

Experience AskLexi on real court cases - no sign up required

Featured: Live AI Demo

United States v. Trump

Court: S.D. Fla.Docket: 9:23-cr-80101

978 docs indexedLive Demo

Ask Lexi anything about the classified documents case

No sign up required. This is a live demo using 978 real court documents.

United States v. Trump (Case No. 9:23-cr-80101) is a landmark federal criminal prosecution filed in the Southern District of Florida before Judge Aileen Cannon. The case centers on the alleged willful retention of classified national defense information at Mar-a-Lago following the end of the Trump presidency in January 2021. Special Counsel Jack Smith led the prosecution, presenting evidence of over 300 classified documents discovered during an FBI search in August 2022. The indictment alleged violations of the Espionage Act (18 U.S.C. § 793), obstruction of justice, and conspiracy charges. Documents allegedly included military attack plans, nuclear weapons information, and intelligence sources. The case was dismissed by Judge Cannon in July 2024 on grounds that the Special Counsel's appointment violated the Appointments Clause, a decision currently under appeal.

Key Events

2023-06-08Grand jury indictment unsealed with 37 counts
2023-07-27Superseding indictment adds 3 more counts
2024-07-15Case dismissed by Judge Cannon

Try Asking

"What charges were filed?"

"Why was the case dismissed?"

"What documents were at Mar-a-Lago?"

View Full Case & Documents

More Demo Cases

United States v. George Santos

E.D.N.Y.

Demo

United States v. George Santos (Case No. 1:23-cr-00234) is a federal criminal prosecution in the Eastern District of New York charging former U.S. Representative George Santos with wire fraud, money laundering, aggravated identity theft, and falsifying records. Santos represented New York's 3rd Congressional District from January 2023 until his expulsion in December 2023. The indictment alleges Santos defrauded donors through fake political committees, charged credit cards without authorization for personal luxury purchases, and stole identities to file fraudulent unemployment claims during COVID-19. The superseding indictment expanded charges to 23 counts. Santos pleaded guilty in August 2024 to wire fraud and aggravated identity theft, facing potential prison sentences. The case highlighted campaign finance violations and fraudulent claims about his background, education, and work history.

Explore Case

NVIDIA Corp. v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB

Supreme Court

Demo

NVIDIA Corporation v. E. Ohman J:or Fonder AB (Docket No. 22-970) is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court securities fraud case examining the pleading standards for scienter under Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Swedish investment fund E. Ohman alleged NVIDIA misrepresented gaming revenue by concealing that significant sales stemmed from cryptocurrency mining during the 2017-2018 crypto boom. When crypto markets crashed, NVIDIA's stock dropped over 28%. The case addresses whether plaintiffs adequately alleged that CEO Jensen Huang and CFO Colette Kress knowingly or recklessly misled investors about the source of revenue. The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's dismissal, finding plaintiffs sufficiently alleged scienter through internal reports and channel checks. The Supreme Court's decision will impact securities class actions nationwide by clarifying what evidence plaintiffs must present at the pleading stage to show executives intended to deceive investors.

Explore Case

Activate with Credits

Pay only for what you use. 1 Credit = 1 Page (up to 30-page cap per document).

Credits: $0.15/page | PACER documents capped at 30 pages billing

Search Now

Access

Pay-as-you-go

$0/month

Unlimited metadata search

Case summaries & timelines

Ask Lexi

Buy credits as needed

Most Popular

Associate

For active researchers

$49/month

350 credits/month included

Everything in Access

Full document access

Rollover up to 1,000 credits

Page-level AI citations

Best Value

Advisor

For legal teams

$199/month

1,500 credits/month included

Everything in Associate

High-Volume Savings

Rollover up to 5,000 credits

Priority support

Enterprise custom solutions available.Contact Sales